Essay on Ignorance in 12 Angry Men - 703 Words

Twelve Angry Men, is a play written by Reginald Rose. The play is about the process of individuals and a court case, which is determining the fate of a teenager. It presents the themes of justice, independence and ignorance. Rose emphasises these three themes through the characters and the dialogue. Justice is the principle of moral rightness or equity. This is shown through juror number eight who isn’t sure whether or not the boy is actually innocent or guilty, but he persists to ask questions and convinces the other jurors to think about the facts first. Independence is shown through both juror number three and ten. They both believe that the defendant is guilty until they both realise that they can not relate there past experiences with†¦show more content†¦He says â€Å"For this kid? You bet I’d pull the switch† juror eight then calls him a â€Å"self- appointed public avenger† which stuns juror number three. Justice is the most important theme throughout this play. It proves that truth can’t be found without a struggle. In the play there was only one juror wanting to hear all the evidence in the court case. But when more facts were found out then some of the other jurors wanted to hear the rest of it, which would determine whether the defendant was guilty or not guilty. No one really knew if the boy was guilty but or not but they figured out that he was not given a fair trial. The defence barrister didn’t care because he wasn’t getting paid enough money to care. So that’s what the jurors thought it was up to them then, to repay the boy with justice. Juror number three is an arrogant, self-minded and extremely ambiguous has had a personal experience in his life, that’s why he wants the boy dead. His son ran away from a fight when he was nine. â€Å" I saw him. I was so ashamed I almost threw up.† Then when he was older the boy then hit him in the face and he has never seen him since. This puts a pre- judged view inside of his head. In the end he thinks to himself that it is not his son that is on trial therefore he can not treat him like that. He can’t hate all teenagers because of his son. Juror number ten is similar to number three inShow MoreRelatedTwelve Angry Men1110 Words   |  5 PagesDoes Twelve Angry Men show that prejudice can obscure the truth? In the play Twelve Angry Men, Reginald Rose shows that prejudices can prevent jurors from seeing the truth. This is evident throughout the play as juror 10 blinded to the facts because prejudice clouds his judgement. However, besides prejudice, Rose also show personal bias, ignorance and a weak characteristic can take away jurors’ abilities to see the truth. For instance, juror 3’s bad relationship with his son in the past and juror7’sRead MoreHow Did Henry Fonda Turn The Jury?1114 Words   |  5 PagesHow did Henry Fonda Turn the Jury? The movie, ’12 Angry Men’ showcases the trial of a young boy, who is accused of stabbing his father and causing him death. Throughout the play, the jury is able to follow through the actions of 12 men, who compose the jury. All of these men come from different backgrounds and the most astounding feature of the movie is in the manner that the experiences and personalities of these members of the jury influences their initial perception of the case. The personal biasRead MoreTwelve Angry Men Essay1265 Words   |  6 PagesIts not easy to stand alone against the ridicule of others. Twelve Angry Men is more than a play, it is a reminder of our social responsibility. Discuss. Twelve Angry Men is a legal drama, written by Reginald Rose during the heightened period of 1950s McCarthyism. The didactic play presents a cross section, examining 1950s America during a period of immense suspicion and uncertainty. Roses play reminds us of the importance of responsibility and integrity, emphasising qualities such as courageRead More12 Angry Men1003 Words   |  5 Pages12 Angry Men depicts the New York murder trial. The premise is the trial of a frightened, teenaged defendant accused of stabbing and killing his father. The judge advises the 12 jurors, that a unanimous decision needs to be made with fair and unbiased manner. If the jury decides unanimously that the boy is guilty he will be sentenced to death. However, if there is a reasonable doubt, the jury needs to reach a ‘not guilty’ decision, and the boy will be freed. A life and death decision needs to beRead MoreThe Power of the Liberal Narrative1654 Words   |  7 Pagesoverloaded—tell h im â€Å"Plenty a’ room, get on,† and thus the need of the collective outweighs the need of the individual. The tale of united victory is present several years later Henry Fonda’s career as well, in the classic tale of the democratic process 12 Angry Men. Just as one member of the Joad family would fail at making it to California on his or her own, so to a jury would fail without the myriad of personalities and experiences which make it up. Henry Fonda stars ad Juror #8, the lone man who thinksRead More12 Angry Men: Movie1698 Words   |  7 Pages12 Angry Men In a world where the jury is the voice of the peoples justice, twelve men sit in a room poised to determine the fate of one boys life. Did he do it? If he didnt, who did? Why would a young man kill his beloved father with a switchblade knife? The moment that the jury-comprised of twelve Caucasian men, abhorrent in todays society-entered the small, blank, bleak room, they had already come to the conclusion that the young man was guilty as charged without deliberation.Read MoreEssay Phi 1031724 Words   |  7 Pagesbecause you lost the election to her.†    Student Answer: Appeal to popularity    Appeal to ignorance    Hasty Generalization    Ad hominem    No fallacy    Points Received: 0 of 1    Comments: Question  5. Question : â€Å"Did you see the men land on the moon? Then how can you be so sure that it happened?†    Student Answer: Appeal to ignorance    Hasty Generalization    Line drawing fallacy    Appeal to force    No fallacyRead MoreAnalysis Of 12 Angry Men1706 Words   |  7 Pages12 Angry Men Mayumi Shimura PRNT207B GCPT Student Table of Contents Introduction 1 Juror #1 1 Juror #2 1 Juror #3 1 Juror #4 2 Juror #5 2 Juror #6 2 Juror #7 3 Juror #8 3 Juror #9 4 Juror #10 4 Juror #11 4 Juror #12 4 Conclusion 5 Introduction â€Å"12 Angry Men†, the movie that is revolved around the trial of the murder case, has different characters from different backgrounds as the jurors. In this report, the communication styles of those people are going to be discussed. They are examined basedRead More12 Angry Men - 81097 Words   |  5 Pages12 Angry Men was one of the most critically acclaimed movies of its time, even gaining several Oscar nominations. The movie tugged into strings that in the course of watching the movie, or even after, continuously made me think. How will one person convince eleven other jurors of reasonable doubt and change their votes from guilty to not guilty? Twelve jurors have individual stands and differences that may have been affected by their experiences and upbringing. Every person in the movie representsRead MoreReligion And Its Impact On Society1343 Words   |  6 PagesAuthor Mark Juergensmeyer explains the problem of religiously perpetuated violence, â€Å"Religion seem s to be connected with violence virtually everywhere†¦ In recent years, religious violence has erupted among right-wing Christians in the United States, angry Muslims and Jews in the Middle East, quarrelling Hindus and Muslims in South Asia, and indigenous religious communities in Africa and Indonesia†¦ The individuals involved in these cases have relied on religion to provide political identities and give